More you might like
This could be us but the US government won't let disabled people marry each other without losing their disability benefits 💕
It's so hard to come to that conclusion though, like at this point unalive is a part of gen Z culture. It's just using a word, they're not even thinking about talking on TikTok or YouTube anymore, they're just talking. It's a lot like people getting mad over AAVE because it's not grammatically correct and yes it's not, but AAVE is a cultural usage of English, a dialect if you will. They use it because their friends and family use it, everyone talks that way. Nobody thinks about grammar when speaking AAVE. It's actually kind of offensive if you try to correct someone. It's like that with unalive too. It's a clashing of culture, we don't understand it because we see it as it was formed, a response to a shitty half ass language filter, not as it is used, which is just another word for kill, death, or died. I really think this one is just not a big deal enough to fight. I think that teacher in the first part, while I agree with the sentiment and find the story funny, it's also in my opinion not about maturity but just a culture thing.
From working with children, the way kids who use unalive react when they hear someone say kill or suicide, it's not just slang or comparable to minoritised dialects, it's self-censorship, active and deliberate with fear of consequences built into it.
Also not to derail but AAVE does in fact have grammar.
I think it’s worth saying too that there are TONS of other euphemisms for death/murder/suicide/etc that evolved naturally over time, feel normal in conversation, n are used often in writing
passed away. deceased. kicked it. bit the dust. offed. done in. six feet under. I can keep going all day
yes, some of these sayings are (when used in conversation)(when used in writing it’s to convey a tone. different rules n all) also self censorship - but they’re self censorship for the sake of not being crass, or for the sake of not technically admitting to a murder, and so on. but until “unalive”, we haven’t seen self censorship for profit. it isn’t a choice to use “unalive” if you want to be seen on half the sites online n that’s the issue ultimately, not the word itself
Saw a post the other day that was like 'guys stop complaining about the One Piece tab, as marketing goes it's very unobtrusive'. Do we think Tumblr took that as a challenge or
Nobody was going in the one piece tab so they had to send out the fucking clown
The clown was so funny honestly it's so badly thought out like
1) no actual indication of what he's advertising so a lot of ppl genuinely had no idea it was part of the One Piece campaign
2) like if they'd gone for the hat guy I think a good number of non-fans would have recognised him but I don't think anyone knows who the fucking clown is
3) he's like. Genuinely creepy & uncomfortable? Again like if they'd put the hat guy down there people might have been like oh cool a little guy on my dash but he's a scary clown who leers at you. Nobody wants the clown.
4) he is blocking part of the UI
they call me mr propaganda because i prop men up and have a ganda at their pretty eyes while i kiss them sweetly. is that anything .
this literally isn't anything but I'm gay so gonna hit rb regardless
they call me mr propaganda because gay people reblog my posts despite them being nothing





![[image id: a screenshot of instagram comments. their usernames have been blocked out for privacy. the first comment reads: "Where's my boy captain jack" in all caps. the reply to this comment, from a different person, reads: "was he ever gay on screen? i think it's just the lgbt+ couples from the show..." end image id.]](https://64.media.tumblr.com/d9d9a1af7f05cbda9a65220adcf189cf/cdfe9bc9a6ff98bc-e6/s1280x1920/297d14b3a5e2882d1f7b68270aabb56368bd174c.jpg)







